Skip to content

Henti provokasi agama, pelihara kerukunan hidup

January 27, 2013
Harakahdaily, 26 Jan 2013

KUALA LUMPUR: Majlis Perundingan Pertubuhan Islam Malaysia (Mapim) menggesa agar semua pihak menghentikan provokasi agama serta tidak mengeluarkan kenyataan yang boleh menegangkan suasana demi memelihara kerukunan hidup antara agama di negara ini.

 

Setiausaha Agungnya, Mohd Azmi Abdul Hamid berkata, mengungkit isu agama yang diketahui akan menyentuh sensitiviti penganut agama masing-masing sangat merbahaya dan tidak bertanggungjawab.

“Kami kesal terhadap pemimpin politik yang tidak berhati-hati dalam mengeluarkan kenyataan yang menimbulkan persepsi yang tidak baik terhadap Islam,” ujarnya dalam satu kenyataan. Dalam masa yang sama, katanya Mapim menegaskan pihak pemimpin agama harus menghormati kedudukan Islam di negara ini terutama soal menarik orang Islam kepada agama lain yang dilarang dalam undang-undang Persekutuan. Menurutnya, pemimpin-pemimpin agama perlu mengambil berat mengenai sensitiviti yang sangat tinggi di kalangan orang Islam terutama dalam isu murtad dan apa sahaja yang dilakukan oleh penyebar agama lain yang boleh menyebabkan orang Islam murtad.

“Negara ini tidak boleh dihadapkan dengan konflik sivil yang akan menghancur segala asas keharmonian antara agama dan ras yang sudah dipupuk sekian lama. “Semua pihak perlu memberi perhatian yang mendalam terhadap situasi kehidupan yang sangat sensitif di negara ini jika isu agama dibangkitkan dengan cara yang tidak hikmah,” tegasnya. Tambahnya, terlalu ghairah bermain dengan sentimen agama yang mudah menimbulkan kemarahan antara penganut adalah satu kesilapan besar yang akan mengakibatkan ketegangan yang sukar dikawal.

Beliau berkata, beberapa insiden tidak lama dahulu di ibu negara dan Pulau Pinang membuktikan bahawa isu agama boleh menimbulkan ketegangan jika tidak dibendung segera.

“Kami juga menuntut agar pihak media lebih bertanggungjawab bila mengangkat Isu agama untuk tatapan masyarakat awam,” ujarnya.

Tambahnya lagi, jika ia tidak dikendalikan dengan bijak media boleh membawa kesan yang negatif kepada persepsi antara penganut agama.

Bible: PAS gesa ambil tindakan provokasi Perkasa

About these ads
4 Comments leave one →
  1. Ace permalink
    January 27, 2013 2:20 am

    Kadangkala aku fikirkan macam ada satu kedangkalan yang berlaku masa kini di antara ketua ketua Agama di Negara kita ini. Bagi orang Islam sudah diturunkan Kul ya ayuhal kafirun…..Bagi Kristian aku rasa pelik juga kerana masih nak guna Allah, sedangkan para Sultan mencegahnya. God = Rabb = Tuhan. Apa tujuan sebenar nak pakai Allah? Bersih kah niat mereka itu? Kalau tak silap dalam bahasa Hebrew di gunakan Illah, gunakan lah ini, Agama ini agama orang Yahudi.

  2. truthseeker permalink
    January 27, 2013 3:31 am

    “Dalam sebuah hadis jelas Nabi Muhammad mengatakan dihina tuhan-tuhan orang kafir, kelak mereka akan menghina tuhan kamu iaitu Allah.”

    Sir,this is a tremendous statement.This proves ALL IS ALLAH.

  3. January 28, 2013 2:58 am

    Dear Dr Zul
    I would like to invite your readers to visit my own blog at OPEN Forum(Malaysia) on the religious stroking action going on off late at myopenforum.wordpress.com

    KLIS

  4. truthseeker permalink
    January 29, 2013 2:43 pm

    “Dari sudut agama, pandangan Hadi betul. Umat bukan Islam mempunyai hak memanggil Supreme Being sebagai Allah.- Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin.

    (72. Allah has promised the believers — men and women, — Gardens under which rivers flow to dwell therein forever, and beautiful mansions in gardens of `Adn (Eden; Paradise). But the greatest bliss is the good pleasure of Allah. That is the supreme success.)

    From Indian metaphysics/spirituality point of view,I quote the GREAT SEER Sri Aurobindo..

    “The Supreme is Pure Being, Absolute Existence, sat. He is Existence because He alone Is, there being nothing else which has any ultimate reality or any being independent of His self-manifestation The Supreme is also Pure Awareness, Absolute Consciousness, cit. We must be on our guard against confusing the ultimate consciousness of Brahman with our own modes of thought ahd knowledge, or calling Him in any but avowedly metaphorical language the Universal Omniscient Mind and by such other terminology; Mind, Thought, Knowledge, Omniscience, Partial Science, Nescience are merely modes in which Consciousness figures under various conditions and in various receptacles. But the Pure Consciousness of the Brahman is a conception which transcends our modes of thinking The Upanishads tell us that Brahman is not a blind universal Force working by its very nature mechanically, nor even an unconscious Cause of Force; He is conscious or rather is Himself Consciousness, cit, as well as sat. It necessarily follows that sat and cit are really the same; Existence is Consciousness and cannot be separated from Consciousness The Supreme is, finally, Pure Ecstasy, Absolute Bliss, ananda. Now just as sat and cit are the same, so are sat and cit not different from ananda; just as Existence is Consciousness and cannot be separated from Consciousness, so Conscious Existence is Bliss and cannot be separated from Bliss. I think we feel this even in the very finite existence and cramped consciousness of life on the material plane. Conscious existence at least cannot endure without pleasure; even in the most miserable sentient being there must be pleasure in existence though it appear small as a grain of mustard seed”

    .

    “Sachchidananda is the One with a triple aspect. In the Supreme the three are not three but one -existence is consciousness, consciousness is bliss, and they are thus inseparable, not only inseparable but so much each other that they are not distinct at all. In the superior planes of manifestation they become triune -although inseparable one can be made more prominent and base or lead the others. In the lower planes below they become separable in appearance, though not in their secret reality , and one can exist phenomenally without the others so that we become aware of what seems to us an inconscient or a painful existence or a consciousness without Ananda. Indeed, without this separation of them in experience pain and ignorance and falsehood and death and what we call inconscience could not have manifested themselves -there could not have been this evolution of a limited and suffering consciousness out of . the universal nescience of Matter.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 47,475 other followers